Silent Symphony

The Piano

November 4, 2024

Silent Symphony: Identity and Resistance in Jane Campion’s The Piano
by Carla Gradiz Gutierrez

The Piano (1993), directed by Jane Campion, is a hauntingly beautiful film that follows Ada, a mute woman with a profound connection to her piano, which she sees as her voice. Set in the wild landscapes of 19th-century New Zealand, Ada, portrayed with mesmerizing intensity by Holly Hunter, is sent into an arranged marriage with a man who neither understands nor values her attachment to the piano. This instrument, symbolic of her unspoken desires and independence, becomes central to the story as she navigates a complex relationship with another man who offers her a strange deal to regain access to her beloved piano. Ada’s silence, ironically, commands a louder presence than any other character in the film. Hunter’s portrayal transcends words, captivating the narrative from the beginning with a striking blend of vulnerability and strength. Even though Ada doesn’t speak, her expressions and actions bring us deep into her inner world, where her piano is more than an instrument—her voice, her identity, her only means of communication and self-expression.

Complicating this dynamic is the presence of Ada’s young daughter, Flora, who watches and learns from her mother’s struggles within a patriarchal society. Raised in this environment, Flora is expected to comply with the rigid expectations placed on women—obedience, silence, and subordination. She witnesses her mother’s arranged marriage to Stewart, a man who fails to understand Ada’s identity, setting an example of traditional power dynamics where a woman’s desires are secondary to a man’s authority. Yet, Ada’s fierce attachment to her piano and refusal to completely surrender to Stewart plant seeds of resistance that Flora observes and is shaped by, even if she doesn’t fully understand it. This portrayal of generational conformity versus quiet rebellion allows The Piano to reflect the norms of its time while challenging them, engaging viewers in a conversation that resonates with ongoing societal dialogues on women’s rights and media representations of females. 

When her new husband, Stewart, refuses to bring the piano to their home, it becomes evident he doesn’t understand Ada. This sets the stage for struggle, as Stewart’s neglect of Ada’s passions reveals his lack of empathy and inability to connect with her emotionally. He sees her only through the lens of traditional marital expectations, expecting obedience and compliance without recognizing her individuality. Stewart’s inability to appreciate the piano is symbolic of his failure to connect with his wife as a person beyond her role as his spouse—a lesson Flora unwittingly absorbs about the way women are often expected to silence themselves to fit into a man’s world. The complex interpretations surrounding The Piano, which some see as a feminist narrative, and others view as misogynistic, underscore how personal and cultural contexts shape our understanding of such themes. The film invites viewers to question its portrayal of Ada’s suffering and resilience.

As Ada’s piano falls into the hands of another man, Baines, she is presented with a strange proposition: she can regain access to her beloved instrument under his conditions. Baines is fascinated by Ada’s connection to the piano and, by extension, her connection to herself. His proposal initiates a series of awkward yet intense encounters that develop into an emotional bond. Unlike Stewart, Baines is intrigued by Ada’s desires and begins to see her not just as someone to possess but as a complex and independent person. This connection ignites a profound change in Ada, who feels alive and understood for the first time since arriving in New Zealand. In these moments, Flora becomes a silent witness to her mother’s pursuit of autonomy. She sees Ada defy societal expectations but also considers the cost: Ada is criticized, controlled, and limited by men who are supposed to protect her. Ada’s relationship with Baines and her attachment to the piano become forms of rebellion against her objectification, allowing Flora to see the possibility of choice—even within an oppressive system.

As Stewart’s jealousy over Ada’s evolving relationship with Baines intensifies, he becomes even more controlling. When he discovers her infidelity, he grows possessive, isolating her in their home as a means of control. Stewart’s rejection of Ada’s piano reflects his rejection of her true self. His actions show that, to him, Ada’s value lies in her ability to conform to his expectations, not in her autonomy or identity. By disregarding the piano, Stewart disregards Ada’s most profound form of self-expression, further alienating her from him emotionally—and Flora, in turn, is exposed to a model of marriage built on dominance rather than partnership. The dynamics between Ada, Baines, and Stewart reveal not only the strict gender roles of the 19th century but also mirror power structures that remain relevant today. Baines’s eventual appreciation of Ada’s autonomy starkly contrasts with Stewart’s desire for control, underscoring how relationships can either liberate or confine a person’s identity.

The film’s ambiguous ending only deepens its emotional impact, leaving us questioning whether Ada ultimately finds freedom and happiness or remains submerged in sorrow. This open-ended conclusion reflects the film’s thematic complexity, allowing viewers to interpret Ada’s fate through their lens. Does she escape into a world where her voice can finally be heard, or is she forever trapped in silence? The powerful essay “Choosing Silence: Defiance and Resistance without Voice in Jane Campion’s The Piano,” written by Mary M. Dalton and Kirsten James Fatzinger, holds a unique position in film discourse due to its ambiguous narrative style, which lends itself to multiple feminist and anti-feminist interpretations. This complexity allows the film to engage with audiences on different levels, inviting them to explore Ada’s silence as both a limitation imposed by society and a personal form of resilience. Through solid visual storytelling and nuanced character dynamics, the film paints a raw, emotional portrait of a woman’s struggle to be heard in a world that refuses to listen. The film’s portrayal of non-verbal communication highlights the human need for connection and self-expression, showing that words are not always necessary to communicate deep, soul-stirring truths. Ada’s story resonates as a reminder that the most profound voices are often the ones we cannot hear but must learn to feel.

Works Cited

Dalton, Mary M., and Kirsten J. Fatzinger. “Choosing Silence: Defiance and Resistance without Voice in Jane Campion’s the Piano: WL.” Women and Language, vol. 26, no. 2, 2003, pp. 34-39. ProQuest, http://rdas-proxy.mercy.edu:2048/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/choosing-silence-defiance-resistance-without/docview/198826797/se-2.

You May Also Like…

Lost in Coppola

Lost in Coppola

By Joel Rivera Born into filmmaking royalty, as the child of Eleanor and Francis Ford Coppola, during the production...

Reflections of Self

Reflections of Self

by Liz Delgado Cléo from 5 to 7 (1962) filmed by Agnès Varda explores internal struggle with self-image and societal...

3 Comments

  1. Nicolas Seguinot

    When watching the film and something I did no elect to say during the in-class discussion is that, to me, one of the most profound forms of rebellion is to be polarizing. To rebel through existence. And it is in this, much as you have described, that I find her silence a version of this rebellion. Holly Hunter did indeed do a fantastic job of portraying a character that uses vulnerability as a strength. That there is strength behind being true to one self and knowing what one wants and in turn never settling for less, even when forced to. From my perspective, Flora ultimately became a product of the patriarchal expectations of the time. Rather than choosing to bolster her mother’s autonomy, she followed the status quo. I like to think Ada forgave her for doing so. As for the ending, I actually enjoyed that it was ambiguous. Perhaps it is just my wishful thinking, but I like to think that she did let go of the piano, that her will did choose life. That she found a new path, a new voice, a new beginning.

    Reply
  2. Joel Rivera

    Jane Campion directed the movie The Piano, not as a typical Hollywood female narrative movie. This movie shows a woman who is mute by choice and uses her piano to express herself. When that is taken away, she fights. In the article Choosing Silence: Defiance and Resistance Without Voice, there is a quote from the movie, “I have not spoken since I was 6 years old. No one knows why, not even me, The strange thing is I don’t think myself silent, that is because of my piano.” This quote, although is a voiceover in the movie, explains exactly how she feels. Her piano is her communication, and when Ada and Baines, have the affair she feels liberated. With Stewart she feels that he does know how important the piano is for her. Her way of expressing who she is, what she wants and find the new beginning as Nicolas mentions in his comment.
    Carla describes the movie well in her blog post. I would like to read more of how she liked Jane Campion’s style of directing in The Piano.
    During the 19th century the era of time was very restrictive for women and they were to behave a certain way. Campion’s directing showed viewers how Ada was able to express herself and finding out who she was and and her strength of know what she wanted.

    Reply
  3. liz d

    When watching this film, the plot twists where unexpected. As this essay states, the film was beyond its time. Carla Gutierrez states “Even though Ada doesn’t speak, her expressions and actions bring us deep into her inner world, where her piano is more than an instrument—her voice, her identity, her only means of communication and self-expression.” and I must agree. The film explores many emotions without the protagonist’s voice. In today’s films that is not something lots of directors decide, nor is it something that an audience would choose. If i had not seen this film I would not have known to appreciate this style of film. Not only was it interesting, but the message of the film was received. I believe that this film should be seen by a younger audience to further appreciate it’s message. As part of a young generation this is not a typical film I would gravitate towards yet I truly enjoyed it. I will be recommending it to my friends!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Mercy University Cinema Studies

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading